Microsoft vs Google: clash of the titans

boxing_gloveA question that comes up fairly regularly in the small business world is how to handle email. Most companies start out with a simple POP account, or maybe even a free address from Google, Yahoo, or MSN. It’s an easy way to get started, but at some point you need more – integration with smart phones, shared calendars, links with company software, better security, and more.

Many companies are opting for Google Apps over Microsoft Exchange. It can be a good option in the right circumstances, and in fact we used Google Apps ourselves for over a year. The web portal is easy to use, the search is lightening fast, and I still miss the unique way Google organizes conversations. Google’s built-in spam filtering is excellent, and because they operate “in the cloud,” they manage the servers so you don’t have to. The downside is that if you have trouble, you are dependent on them for support. If you use a free account, good luck – it may take a while.

Microsoft Exchange is still the powerhouse in the email game, and the level of sophistication is hard to beat. It will take more technical skill to maintain your own in-house Exchange server, but if you take that on, you have far more options available to you. You can set security nearly any way you like, you can track down deliverability issues (generally difficult or impossible with a hosted solution), and most software packages that require email and calendar integration work with Exchange by default. Use a spam filtering service to keep your inbox clean, and with most services that layers in the redundancy you’d have with a hosted solution, to prevent lost email if your server or internet connection goes down.

Our Own Email: What We’ve Done

Like many companies, we started with a basic POP account. As we grew, we used some Exchange features but moved to Google Apps as our primary solution. As we continued to grow, it lacked critical features we needed, including security, integration, and ability to easily manage email settings across the company. We moved back to Exchange, and it was absolutely the right solution for us. We are operating far more efficiently, and our software is completely integrated so we can schedule and communicate with our clients seamlessly from our ticketing system.

My favorite (and unexpected) benefit of our return to Exchange? The integration with my iPhone is superb, night and day from what it was with Google Apps. I no longer have to sync my phone because it pulls directly from our server. That means that if someone in the office adds an appointment to my calendar, it’s automatically there next time I check my phone. Email and contacts too.


1 Response to “Microsoft vs Google: clash of the titans”


  1. 1 Mark Barry October 21, 2009 at 10:33 am

    Consider the Forrester research published in January ’09 (link below). Their analysis indicates that most firms underestimate costs to manage e-mail in-house. Google apps costs a LOT less — $50 per user per year for 25GB of on-line e-mail storage + $45 for unlimited archival storage (up to ten years of archives) — this saves 50% or more, all things considered. The Forrester report says cloud-based e-mail is cost-justified for organizations up to 15,000 mailboxes. Yes, you lose ease of integration with other Microsoft tools used internally (SharePoint, BizTalk) — but moving to open standards & web services internally has a side benefit — it allows you to use the same data integration tools & techniques to communicate & collaborate internally that you use to collaborate with your customers and suppliers. Unless you assume that all your clients and business partners use only Microsoft technologies, even if there’s internal pain, you’ll probably end up easier to do business with on the web. That’s worth a lot! As for mobile devices, I’ve had no trouble syncing my iPhone, after I took a deep breath & moved all my e-mail, contacts and calendar to Google. All three auto-sync perfectly both ways between the browser and the iPhone, no problems. Cloud-based solutions are not perfect, but on balance, for e-mail & collaboration, they’re better and less costly than client-server. I no longer have Outlook installed, I don’t worry about any data locally (unless I save attachments) it’s free (over 7GB of storage) and I can use any computer with a browser and Internet connection to check my e-mail, contacts & calendar.

    http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/admins/pdf/forrester_cloud_email_cost_analysis.pdf


Leave a Reply




View Wendy Gauntt's profile on LinkedIn

Categories

CIO Services

My company is CIO Services, located centrally in St. Louis, Missouri. We provide computer network support and website development services to small businesses locally and nationally. Visit the CIO Services website for more details.